Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Walgreen CO et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2023cv13061
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO, The Kroger Co., Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
US, et al v. American Airlines Group Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC.
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
Interested Party:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., DELTA AIR LINES, INC., GLEN HAUENSTEIN and others
Concepcion, et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
as 23-1558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CONCEPCION, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, ALDEMAR BURGOS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and SIDNEY DUPREY CONDE, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, d/b/a MLB, ROBERT D. MANFRED, JR., ALLAN HUBER SELIG and others
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Koch Foods Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01605
Defendant:
Mar-Jac Holdings, LLC, Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Monroe County Health Care Authority v. General Electric Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10485
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Health Care Authority d/b/a Monroe County Hospital
Defendant:
General Electric Co., Inc., DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. and GE Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Carolina Catering Corp. v. Aerostar Airport Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01130
Plaintiff:
Carolina Catering Corp. d/b/a Sky Caterers and Carolina Catering Corporation
Defendant:
Prohibas Inflight Catering, LLC, Aerostar Airport Holdings, LLC and Prohias Inflight Catering, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
United Food & Comm. Workers, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., et al
as 17-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
AFSCME HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MINNESOTA LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG
United Food & Comm. Workers, et al v. Novartis Pharm., et al
as 17-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, AFSCME HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., NOVARTIS CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG
Amicus Curiae:
OPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant:
Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Puerto Rico Tele. Co., Inc. v. San Juan Cable LLC
as 16-2132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN JUAN CABLE LLC, d/b/a OneLink Communications, a/k/a Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico LLC
Interested Party:
ARMANDO DIAZ, OPUS CONSULTING, INC. and BERMUDEZ, LONGO, DIAZ-MASSO, LLC (BLDM)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
