Cases 1 - 8 of 8
O'Shea et al v. Boston City Council
as 1:2022cv12048
Plaintiff:
Robert O'Shea, Rita Dixon, Shirley Shillingford and others
Defendant:
Boston City Council
Amicus Curiae:
NAACP Boston Branch, MassVote, Massachusetts Voter Table and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Worcester Interfaith, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40015
Plaintiff:
Nelly Medina, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay, Delia Vega and others
Defendant:
Candy Mero-Carlson, John Stewart, Worcester Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sabell v. Town of Groton et al
as 1:2018cv12312
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Michael Bouchard and Town of Groton
Plaintiff:
John L. Saball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katz Vakil v. Secretary of State, Massachusetts
as 1:2017cv10315
Plaintiff:
Kora Roberta Katz Vakil
Defendant:
Secretary of State, Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ussach et al v. The City of New Bedford, Massachusetts
as 1:2013cv10177
Plaintiff:
Jill Ussach and Harvey B. Ussach
Defendant:
The City of New Bedford, Massachusetts and Maria Tomasia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barr, et al v. Galvin
as 09-2426
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BOB BARR, WAYNE A. ROOT, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. GALVIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Barr, et al v. Galvin
as 08-2419
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BOB BARR, WAYNE A. ROOT, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. GALVIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Barr et al v. Galvin
as 1:2008cv11340
Plaintiff:
Bob Barr, Bob Barr, Bob Barr and others
Defendant:
William F. Galvin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
