Cases 41 - 50 of 138
DOLLIVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00244
Petitioner:
DARRELL DOLLIVER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Torres-Recio v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv01427
Plaintiff:
Ramon L. Torres-Recio
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
v. Holley et al
as 1:2007cv12152
Movant:
Randy Holley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alcequiez v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01933
Plaintiff:
Roberto Alcequiez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LEMIEUX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00151
Petitioner:
STEVEN LEMIEUX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Loriano v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00367
Petitioner:
Luis Loriano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MAHONE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00148
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A MAHONE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cruz-Arroyo v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01866
Plaintiff:
Jose Gerardo Cruz-Arroyo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanjurjo-Figueroa v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01865
Plaintiff:
Angel T. Sanjurjo-Figueroa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edelkind v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv11709
Petitioner:
Jamie Edelkind
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
