Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Young v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40089
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Young
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. Sabol
as 10-1344
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE COLEMAN
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL
Burgess v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40028
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Burgess
Defendant:
J Grondolsky, FMC, Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McRae v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2009cv11597
Petitioner:
Jack McRae and Jack McRae
Respondent:
J Grondolsky and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Black v. Sabol et al
as 4:2009cv40115
Petitioner:
Michael Black
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whalen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv10491
Petitioner:
Richard J. Whalen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Brenda O'Donnell and Renda
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dunbar v. Day et al
as 4:2008cv40235
Petitioner:
Bruce Dunbar
Respondent:
Andrea Day, Jason Nelson, Carrie Hunton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dunbar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2008cv40031
Petitioner:
Bruce E. Dunbar
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Iloka v. Sabol et al
as 4:2008cv40012
Petitioner:
Godwin Iloka
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marino v. Lindsay et al
as 1:2007cv12207
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino
Respondent:
Cameron Lindsay, Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
