Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Rogers v. New Hampshire, State of
as 1:2013fp00322
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
New Hampshire, State of
Petitioner:
Scott N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traudt v. NH Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv00234
Respondent:
NH Attorney General and NH, State of
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
Scott Traudt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Rockingham County Superior Court
as 1:2012cv00370
Petitioner:
Scott E. Reynolds
Respondent:
Rockingham County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. New Hampshire, State of
as 1:2012fp00324
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
New Hampshire, State of
Petitioner:
Scott Nicholas Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abbott v. Burnheimer
as 12-1937
Petitioner - Appellant:
DREW G. ABBOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT V. BURNHEIMER
ABBOTT v. BURNHEIMER
as 1:2012cv00037
Petitioner:
DREW G ABBOTT
Defendant:
SCOTT BURNHEIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYWARD v. JONES
as 1:2012cv00020
Petitioner:
JOEL T HAYWARD
Respondent:
SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Anderson
as 1:2011cv11355
Petitioner:
Eric Rivera
Respondent:
Scott Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOOD v. JONES
as 1:2011cv00281
Petitioner:
ANDREW P FLOOD
Respondent:
SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Francis v. Anderson
as 1:2011cv11239
Petitioner:
O'Neil Francis
Respondent:
Scott Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
