Cases 31 - 40 of 5,288
Scott v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024fp00209
Petitioner:
Adam Scott
Respondent:
Department of Justice and A. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 1:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 3:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horstkotte v. State of NH
as 1:2024fp00187
Participant:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
NH, State of
Petitioner:
Todd M. Horstkotte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acevedo v. Mici
as 1:2024cv11486
Respondent:
Carol Mici
Petitioner:
Angel Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. F.J Bowers
as 1:2024cv11587
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
F.J Bowers and FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLOOD v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2024cv00224
Unknown:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Petitioner:
ANDREW P FLOOD
Respondent:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Velez-Acevedo v. Santos
as 3:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Alfredo Velez-Acevedo
Defendant:
Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez and Pedro Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ng v. Lizotte
as 1:2024cv11570
Respondent:
Kenneth Lizotte
Petitioner:
Yat Fung Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
