Cases 1 - 10 of 5,243
Gibson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv11550
Petitioner:
Dax Gibson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haro v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2024cv11532
Petitioner:
Noel Haro
Respondent:
Shawn P. Jenkins and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2024cv11462
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia-Parra v. Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Garcia-Parra
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zapata v. Divris
as 24-1521
Petitioner:
CARLOS RAMON ZAPATA
Respondent:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent
Mass v. Warden of FCI Danbury
as 1:2024cv11388
Petitioner:
Adrian Mass
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gibson v. Gray
as 24-1510
Petitioner:
DARIUS GIBSON
Respondent:
DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024fp00148
Petitioner:
Maurice Morlee Johnson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harrington v. Northern NH Correctional Facility
as 1:2024fp00147
Petitioner:
Kevin Harrington
Respondent:
Northern NH Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
