Cases 151 - 160 of 2,089
Melendez Cruz v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 1:2022cv10581
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, C.P.C.S, Javier Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv10571
Plaintiff:
Stephon Samuel
Defendant:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Superintendent Antone Moniz, Ralph Mattarello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flete-Garcia v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10612
Plaintiff:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Pike County Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv10583
Plaintiff:
Damion Davis
Defendant:
Pike County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russo v. DaSilva et al
as 1:2022cv10504
Plaintiff:
Richard R Russo
Defendant:
Bryan DaSilva, Patrick Johnston, John Cristiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jobson v. Deschene et al
as 1:2022cv10756
Plaintiff:
Jose Jobson
Defendant:
Robert J. Deschene, John J. Madden and David Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLong v. Dickhaut
as 1:2022cv10309
Plaintiff:
Joseph DeLong
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. Chelsea Trial Court
as 1:2022cv10481
Plaintiff:
Arev Mock
Defendant:
Chelsea Trial Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10430
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 4:2022cv40047
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
