Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Wattleton, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 10-1866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Plaintiff:
KEDRICK F. O'MEARA, JOSEPH SANTULLI, MERVIN WATAHOMIGIE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services, US PROBATION and US BUREAU OF PRISONS
Wattleton v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv40106
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Brian Smith and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dessesavre v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv10842
Plaintiff:
Earl Dessesavre
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, John Broderick, Jr. and Boston, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv10845
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and T. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. Calauttii, et al
as 10-1411
Petitioner:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON, Representing himself and those persons similarly situated
Respondent:
MR. CALAUTTII, MR. HARVEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Wattleton v. Amica et al
as 4:2010cv40025
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Amica, Federal Medical Center at Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wattleton v. Paul et al
as 4:2009cv40156
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Charles David Paul, Ann Conners and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wattleton v. Paul et al
as 1:2009cv11491
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Charles David Paul, Ann Conners and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wattleton v. Sebellus
as 09-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Wattleton v. Bollinger et al
as 4:2009cv40116
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Michael Bollinger, David Paul and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
