Cases 41 - 50 of 69
ADAMS v. CUMMING et al
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Defendant:
PAUL CUMMING and J NEWCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abubardar v. Creedon et al
as 1:2015cv12824
Defendant:
Robert J. Creedon, Jr., Clerk Magistrate, Adam J. Baler and others
Plaintiff:
Raheem Rasheed Abubardar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00514
Plaintiff:
HERBERT M ADAMS, IV
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITSPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
HERBERT M ADAMS, IV
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, FRANK HOCKERSMITH, ROBERT CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 14-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MCNEIL, TD BANKNORTH, N. A. and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF, United States Attorneys
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR., CHRISTOPHER J. DURKIN, DALE L. ARMSTRONG and others
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKL and others
ADAMS v. STATE OF MAINE CO WORKERS et al
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN DANIEL ADAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE CO WORKERS, STATE OF MAINE, DAVE ALLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN DANIEL ADAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
