Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Benyamin v. UMASS Medical Center et al
as 1:2011cv11181
Plaintiff:
George Benyamin
Defendant:
UMASS Medical Center, Gene Chaissen and Carol Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battista v. Clarke, et al
as 10-1965
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDY J. BATTISTA
Defendant - Appellant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and MICHAEL CORSINI
Defendant:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, ROBERT MURPHY, STEVE FAIRLY and others
Interested Party:
MHM SERVICES, INC.
Martin v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11712
Plaintiff:
Willilam J. Martin
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Umass Correctional Medical Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Poisson, et al
as 09-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
RON POISSON, a/k/a PISS-ON, KIM I. MARTIN, JACQUELYN E. ROKUSEK and others
Akers v. Keszei, et al
as 09-1654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES KESZEI, DONALD JAMES MIXAN, JR., MISTY STEWART and others
Schofield v. Horsman et al
as 4:2009cv40085
Plaintiff:
Eugene Schofield
Defendant:
Donald Horsman, Rich Monroe, Carol Lawton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKERS v. POISSON et al
as 2:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant:
RON POISSON, KIM I MARTIN, DOES 1 - 9 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, Commissioner, JAMES R. BENDER, Assistant Deputy Commissioner, TIMOTHY HALL, Assistant Deputy Commissioner and others
Silva et al v. Middlesex County et al
as 1:2008cv11863
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Silva and Sean Cashman
Defendant:
Middlesex County, James DiPaula, Paul Norton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Akers et al v. Keszei et al
as 1:2008cv00334
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
James Keszei, Donald James Mixan, Jr., Misty Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
