Prison Condition Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 61 - 70 of 112
Lipscomb v. Grondolsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12069
Petitioner: Anthony Lipscomb
Respondent: J Grondolsky and The Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eddington v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11711
Petitioner: Timothy Eddington
Respondent: Warden J. Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armstrong v. Russo
as 1:2016cv10846
Petitioner: Edward Armstrong
Respondent: Lois Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfe v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10745
Petitioner: Isaac Lennis Wolfe
Respondent: Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wallace v. Tompkins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10746
Petitioner: Nickoyan Wallace
Respondent: Steven W. Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sellers v. Kazm et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10426
Plaintiff: John Robert Sellers , Jr
Defendant: Kazm, Hass and BOP Psychiatrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gagnon v. Mitchell
as 1:2016cv10109
Petitioner: Robert Gagnon
Respondent: Lisa A. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cannon v. Noel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv14196
Plaintiff: Joseph Sherod Cannon
Defendant: Sergeant Noel, C.O. Primentel and Lieutenant Hallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv14028
Petitioner: Isaac Lennis Wolfe
Respondent: Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cristobal v. Riccitelli et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv13139
Petitioner: El Rey Cristobal
Respondent: Anthony Riccitelli, Aaron Hattenback and Tamara Barney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?