Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 103
DAHHAN v. OvaScience, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv10511
Plaintiff: FADI DAHHAN
Defendant: OvaScience, Inc., Michelle Dipp and Jeffrey E. Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Santander Securities LLC et al v. Calzada-Medero et al
as 3:2016cv03206
Plaintiff: Santander Securities LLC , Salvador Gomez-Carbia and Alexandra M. Calderon
Defendant: Antonio Calzada-Medero, Sandra Gomez, Ana M. Mediavilla and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Brennan, et al v. Zafgen, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2057
Plaintiff: AVIAD BESSLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situtated and THEODORE J. DALY
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRY BRENNAN, RON KENNER, KEVIN KOZIATEK and others
Defendant - Appellee: ZAFGEN, INC. and THOMAS E. HUGHES
Interested Party: OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Movant: BRENNAN GROUP
Crandall v. PTC Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10471
Plaintiff: Matthew Crandall
Defendant: PTC Inc. , James Heppelmann , Jeffrey Glidden and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lauring et al v. Weiss et al
as 4:2016cv40015
Plaintiff: Lauring, John P. Lauring, Lauring Charitable Foundation and others
Defendant: Weiss, Lee D. Weiss, Family Endowment Partners, LP and others
Interested Party: David E. Bower
Trustee: Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Carlson et al v. Dipp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv14032
Plaintiff: Heather Carlson , Philipp Hofmann and Carlos Rivas
Defendant: Michelle Dipp , Jeffrey E. Young , Richard H. Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bessler v. Zafgen, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv13618
Plaintiff: Aviad Bessler
Defendant: Zafgen, Inc. and Thomas E. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Richard, et al v. State Street Bank and Trust Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1597
Plaintiff - Appellee: CASEY J. RICHARD, MARILYN DEMORY, TIMOTHY W. HILL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant: CHARLES F. FRANZ and NITA W. FRANZ
Defendant - Appellee: STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF STATE STREET CORPORATION, STATE STREET CORPORATION, INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Defendant: RICHARD LOGUE and LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.
Interested Party: MIAMI BEACH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN, THOMAS U. KENNEY and NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Elmachtoub, et al v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1491
Plaintiff: NABIL ELMACHTOUB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JAMES L. BURCH, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH BRADLEY, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HARVEY J. BERGER, FRANK G. HALUSKA and others
Defendant: DAVID E. I. PYOTT, MIKE R. BOWLIN, JOHN T. CARDIS and others
Movant: JOSEPH MASSAGLIA, KENNETH CANAWAY, ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M. B. H. and others
Richard, et al v. State Street Bank and Trust Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1193
Plaintiff - Appellee: CASEY J. RICHARD, MARILYN DEMORY, TIMOTHY W. HILL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant: CHARLES F. FRANZ and NITA W. FRANZ
Defendant - Appellee: STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF STATE STREET CORPORATION, STATE STREET CORPORATION, INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Movant: MIAMI BEACH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN
Interested Party: THOMAS U. KENNEY and NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?