Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
US ex. rel. Ge v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant: HELEN GE
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
Link v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 1:2011cv00603
Plaintiff: Melissa J. Link
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc., HTC, Inc. and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Ferreira v. Carrier IQ, Inc. Featured Case
as 1:2011cv12146
Plaintiff: Dylan T Ferreira
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc., HTC America, Inc. and HTC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Libby v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 1:2011cv12150
Plaintiff: Joshua Libby
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc., HTC, Inc. and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv10343
Plaintiff: United States of America , California, State of, State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
STRONG ELECTRIC v. TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv00448
Plaintiff: STRONG ELECTRIC
Defendant: TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY, TECUMSEH COMPRESSOR COMPANY, TECUMSEH DO BRASIL LTDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11043
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?