Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Carp et al v. United Cultivation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv12202
Plaintiff:
Douglas Carp and Robert Carp
Defendant:
United Cultivation, LLC, Blue and Yellow Holdings, LLC, Michael Spengler and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Laureano-Osorio v. Pantfoerder et al
as 3:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Laureano-Osorio
Defendant:
Achim Pantfoerder, Daniel R. Borges, Irene M. Graff and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Saunders v. Picard et al
as 1:2021cv11240
Plaintiff:
Mark Saunders
Defendant:
Rosalind Picard, Ann McKay, Kristen Luken and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Emrit v. National Football League et al
as 1:2019cv12272
Defendant:
Daniel Snyder, Washigton RedSkins and National Football League
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Earle et al v. Standard Process, Inc.
as 1:2019cv10613
Undetermined:
Standard Process, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Antitrend LLC and Daniel R. Earle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Earle et al v. Standard Process, Inc.
as 1:2019cv10612
Plaintiff:
The Antitrend LLC and Daniel R. Earle
Defendant:
Standard Process, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chatham v. Canterbury Ventures LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11473
Defendant:
Canterbury Ventures LLC , Daniel J. Lewis and Patricia A. Bergevine
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Chatham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kam IV, Inc. v. D'Onfro
as 1:2016cv12079
Plaintiff:
Kam IV, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel D'Onfro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. Keville et al
as 1:2015cv13009
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
David Keville, Daniel Crosby and Country Saloon Products, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIDD v. HOME DEPOT INC et al
as 2:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
BRUNS DANIEL KIDD
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT INC and RELIANCE WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
