Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hill et al v. Toast, Inc,
as 1:2024cv11485
Plaintiff:
Meggan Hill, Benjamin Gorges, Christina Conte Wartinbee and others
Defendant:
Toast, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Saunders v. Picard et al
as 1:2021cv11240
Plaintiff:
Mark Saunders
Defendant:
Rosalind Picard, Ann McKay, Kristen Luken and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Milliman, Inc. et al v. Gradient A.I. Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10865
Defendant:
Gradient A.I. Corp., Stanford A. Smith and Samuel Chase Pettus
Plaintiff:
Milliman, Inc., Vigilytics LLC and Milliman Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Scarfone v. Smith
as 1:2021cv10608
Plaintiff:
Julie Renee Scarfone
Defendant:
Keely Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Global Protection Corp. et al v. Arthur et al
as 1:2018cv10966
Plaintiff:
Global Protection Corp. and Karex Berhad SDN BHD
Defendant:
Eric J. Arthur and MSC of Fort Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chavez v. Bertlsmann,SE and Co KGA et al
as 1:2018cv10222
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Bertelsmann, SE and Co KG and A, RTL, Group, Fremantlemedia LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings LLC v Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2016cv11026
Plaintiff:
Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ConforMIS, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2016cv10420
Plaintiff:
ConforMIS, Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith & Jones Advertising v. The Idea Agency, LLC
as 4:2015cv40012
Plaintiff:
Smith & Jones Advertising
Defendant:
The Idea Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
PLT Associates, Inc. v. Roberts et al
as 1:2013cv12278
Plaintiff:
PLT Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Richards A. Roberts, Alan Debrowolski, Hampton Toy Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
