Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Lundy v. O'Malley
as 24-1245
Plaintiff:
T. L. and TAI-NAJAH LUNDY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Mattes v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10640
Plaintiff:
Devra Mattes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collyn L v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Collyn Lavier
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sauvageau v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv40036
Plaintiff:
Scott Sauvageau
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Khoyi v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10317
Plaintiff:
Lauren Amy Khoyi and Lauren Amy Khoyi Noyes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Grassis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10543
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Grassis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Marilyn M v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Marrero
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mercado v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10423
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mercado
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10417
Plaintiff:
Jamile C Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Howell v. O'Malley
as 24-1161
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
