Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Justiniano-Ramirez v. Social Security Administration, et al
as 24-1102
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ, MARIE V. PAGAN-LISBOA and DANIEL JUSTINIANO-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Roman-Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
Mayra Roman-Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01055
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Francisco Oscar Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carreras-Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01675
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Emil Carreras-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ramirez-Montanez v. Commissioner social security
as 3:2019cv01658
Defendant:
Commissioner social security
Plaintiff:
Hilda Ivette Ramirez-Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ramirez-Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01426
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Venier Antonio Ramirez-Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ramos-Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01306
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ramos-Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pagan Lisboa et al v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2018cv01830
Plaintiff:
Daniel Justiniano Ramirez and Marie V Pagan Lisboa
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Social Security et al
as 3:2018cv01101
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Perez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez Robles v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv12497
Plaintiff:
Lucrecia I. Ramirez Robles
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
