Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Sugarloaf Funding, LLC, et al v. US Dept of the Treasury
as 08-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUGARLOAF FUNDING, LLC, DERRINGER TRADING, LLC, KNIGHT TRADING, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF TREASURY
Argent Mortgage Company, LLC v. East Wallum Lake Trust, et al.
as 1:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Argent Mortgage Company, LLC
Defendant:
East Wallum Lake Trust, John K. Lace, Lisa Lace and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. Dolan et al
as 1:2008cv10244
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John A. Dolan, Jr., John A. Dolan, Sr., Key Bank and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Dolan et al
as 1:2008cv10235
Defendant:
John A. Dolan, Jr., John A. Dolan, Sr., Revenue, Massachusetts Department of and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Webster Bank v. Estate of John P. Ward et al
as 1:2007cv12305
Plaintiff:
Webster Bank
Defendant:
Estate of John P. Ward, Susan R. Ward, Drummond Realty Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Flanagan v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv11341
Plaintiff:
John Flanagan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Sugarloaf Funding, LLC et al v. United States of America, Department of the Treasury
as 1:2007cv11211
Plaintiff:
Sugarloaf Funding, LLC, Sugarloaf Funding, LLC, Sugarloaf Funding, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Ned Stevens Advertising, Inc. v. Lace et al
as 1:2007cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ned Stevens Advertising, Inc.
Defendant:
John Lace, The United States of America (Department of the Internal Revenue), Mark Adams and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
