Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Riddick v. Miliotis, et al
as 11-1577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON RIDDICK
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK G. MILIOTIS, Attorney, Law Offices of Mark Miliotis, ANTHONY NEAL, Law Offices of Anthony Neal, KEVIN J. O'CONNOR, Attorney, Law offices of Hermes, Netburn, O'Connor & Spearing, P.C. and others
Saint Annes Development Company, LLC et al v. Trabich et al
as 1:2011mc00066
Plaintiff:
Saint Annes Development Company, LLC and Aaron Young
Defendant:
Neal Trabich, Terry Trabich and The Washington Trust Comnpany
Riddick v. Miliotis et al
as 1:2011cv10613
Plaintiff:
Sharon Riddick
Defendant:
Mark Miliotis, Anthony Neal, Kevin J. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In Re: National Organization, et al
as 10-1350
Petitioner:
In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION and NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE
Respondent:
NEAL T. ADAMS, R. CHRISTOPHER ALMY, STEPHANIE ANDERSON and others
Interested Party:
ME CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ELECTIONS
Cameron v. City of Boston, et al, et al
as 08-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELEN CAMERON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT, BOSTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE and others
Mulet v. EnerNOC, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10429
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mulet
Defendant:
EnerNOC, Inc., Timothy G Healy, David B Brewster and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Calvert v. EnerNOC, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10378
Plaintiff:
Galen Calvert and Galen Calvert
Defendant:
EnerNOC, Inc., Timothy G Healy, T J Glauthier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gunther v. EnerNOC, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv10361
Plaintiff:
Matt Gunther
Defendant:
EnerNOC, Inc., Timothy G Healy, David B Brewster and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cameron v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2007cv12182
Plaintiff:
Helen Cameron
Defendant:
City of Boston, Boston Public Schools Department, Boston School Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
