Cases 21 - 30 of 49
US, et al v. Guidant Corporation, et al
as 12-1867
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF ARKANSAS, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEIDI HEINEMAN-GUTA, Relator
Defendant - Appellee:
GUIDANT CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Guidant Corporation
United States of America v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10896
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Arkansas, State of California and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States, ex rel. v. Millennium Laboratories of CA
as 12-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CUNNINGHAM and ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Castro v. Child Support Lien Network et al
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jorge Castro
Defendant:
Child Support Lien Network, State of California Dept of Child Support Services and The Commerce Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 11-1336
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KAMMERER
Defendant - Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ALZA CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Interested Party:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
United States of America et al v. ev3, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11822
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Jeffrey D'Agostino , John Doe and others
Defendant:
ev3, Inc. , John Hardin , Microtherapeutics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America ex. rel. Alex Booker and Edmund Hebron, et a.l v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11166
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2010cv11043
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Citizens for Consume, et al v. Abbott Laboratories,, et al
as 1:2001cv12257
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Consumer Justice , Colorado Progressive Coalition , Congress of California Seniors and others
Defendant:
Allergan Worldwide , Astrazeneca US , Bayer, AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Shirley Geller , United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midest Health Benefits Fund , Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. , Fujisawa Pharmaceut, Monsanto CO. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Roberta S. Starks , Kimberly K. Hoover , National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Amicu:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY a/k/a BRISTOL-MYERS ONCOLOGY DIVISION/HIV PRODUCTS , GENSIA SICOR, INC., Novartis AG and others
Movant:
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield , Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization, Inc., Neighborhood Health Plan, Inc. and others
Adr_provider:
Eric Green and Jonathan Marks
Respondent:
Luis E. Cobo
Objector:
Patricia Weatherly and James W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA et al v. Guidant Corporation
as 1:2009cv11927
Plaintiff:
USA , State of Arkansas , State of California and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
