Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Leers Weinzapfel Associates Architects, Inc. v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv12428
Plaintiff:
Leers Weinzapfel Associates Architects, Inc.
Defendant:
Director Laura B. Zuchowski, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ojo v. Rivera, et al
as 15-8004
Petitioner:
OSAHENRUMWEN OJO
Respondent:
DAVID RIVERA, SIMON A. NADER, Field Office Director, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Akrong v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 4:2013cv40145
Plaintiff:
Richard Akrong
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Vorontsova v. Chertoff, et al
as 08-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SVITLANA VORONTSOVA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALES, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and DENNIS RIORDAN RIORDAN, as District Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service for Boston, Massachusetts
:
Mironchikova et al v. Keisler et al
as 1:2007cv11726
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mironchikova, Andrey Vladdimirovic Spichkin and Dmitriy Andreevich Spichkin
Defendant:
Peter D Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv11001
Plaintiff:
Shaobo Chen
Defendant:
Emilio T. Gonzalez, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Demidov v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10723
Plaintiff:
Andrey Demidov
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Yin et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 1:2007cv10086
Plaintiff:
Guixia Yin and Xiaobei Wang
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
