Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Doe v. Trustees of Boston College
as 19-1871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellant:
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
Amicus Curiae:
SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE, TUFTS UNIVERSITY and others
Cross v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 19-1555
Defendant / Appellee:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DIVISION OF UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMER EUGENE CROSS
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana et al v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12538
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HMO Louisiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Makarova Cross et al v. US Treasury Department et al
as 1:2018cv00346
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and US Treasury Department
Plaintiff:
Nellie Makarova Cross and Sergey Korolev
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'n, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
as 1:2018mc00018
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'n, et al.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithkline, LLC.
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
United Food & Comm. Workers, et al v. Novartis Pharm., et al
as 17-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, AFSCME HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., NOVARTIS CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG
Amicus Curiae:
OPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE
United Food & Comm. Workers, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., et al
as 17-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
AFSCME HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MINNESOTA LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02002
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. , Corey Musselman, M.D. , The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, L.L.P. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation, Cambia Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US, ex rel Hamrick, et al v. Glaxosmithkline, PLC, et al
as 15-1434
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, GREGORY W. THORPE, THOMAS GERAHTY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLAIR HAMRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline
Interested Party:
MA RELATORS, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
