Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Erickson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2011mc91307
Plaintiff:
Heidi K. Erickson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, AOTC, CPCS and others
McDonald, et al v. Turner, et al
as 11-9001
Debtor - Appellant:
NANCY COOK MCDONALD and RICHARD C MCDONALD, JR.
Creditor - Appellee:
FARRAND M O'DONOGHUE, individually and in her capacities as Guardian and Attorney in Fact for Richard Chauncey McDonald and as Trustee of the Richard Chauncey McDonald Trust as Amended and Restated on July 12, 2004 and RICHARD C MCDONALD, SR.
Trustee - Appellee:
JOHN C TURNER, Chapter 7 Trustee
Fossen, et al v. Tyco International, Ltd., et al
as 11-1258
Plaintiff:
ERISA, LIONEL I. BRAZEN, ROBERT BOVIT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY C. VAN FOSSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TYCO INTL. LTD., MARK A. BELNICK, MARK H. SWARTZ and others
Defendant:
EDWARD D. BREEN, DAVID J. FITZPATRICK, JOHN A. KROL, Current Board of Directors and others
Interested Party:
BANK OF AMERICA/EVERCORE TRUST COMPANY, DMD JOEL P. DOUGLAS, CHARLES L. GLASS and others
Stefanik v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010mc30029
Petitioner:
Thomas Stefanik
Respondent:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Kevin Burke, Joseph D. McDonald and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
