Cases 31 - 40 of 1,067
Djokro, et al v. Garland
as 23-1712
Petitioner:
HARTONO DJOKRO and WILLIAM SIMAJAYA DJOKRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
US v. Berrios-Cruz
as 23-1708
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM BERRIOS-CRUZ
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, MARY S. MCELROY, Individual and Official Capacity, JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Jeannite v. Hull
as 1:2023cv11316
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
William Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oliver v. Michaud et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oliver and Clyde Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph Leonard Michaud, Mary Susan McElroy, John James McConnell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCance, et al v. Kreger, et al
as 1:2023cv10955
Petitioner:
William Henry McCance, Susan Marie LeMoine, Trust Advisory Group, LTD and others
Respondent:
Richard Henri Kreger, Bruce Charles Ryan and RHK Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Vivaldi Servicios de Seguridad, Inc. v. Maiso Group, Corp., et al
as 23-1372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIVALDI SERVICIOS DE SEGURIDAD, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MAISO GROUP, CORP., JORGE W. MAISONET-RIVERA, WILLIAM MAISONET-RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ocean Development Partners, LLC, et al. v. NE Edge, et al.
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ocean Development Partners, LLC, Ocean Development Partners, LLC, MA, Gotspace Data LLC and others
Defendant:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES, SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
