Cases 41 - 47 of 47
IN RE: Hannaford Bros Co. Cust
as 08-8068
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JERZY DOBRYNIEWSKI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, DAVID HURD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARLINE NENNI and others
Plaintiff:
BODYWORKS HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, d/b/a Planet Fitness and BODYWORKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, d/b/a Planet Fitness
Defendant:
DELHAIZE AMERICA INC., d/b/a Sweetbay and HANNAFORD BROTHERS CO.
Defendant - Petitioner:
KASH N KARRY FOOD STORES INC., d/b/a Sweetbay Supermarkets, a/k/a Sweetbay Liquors
United States of America v. Lane
as 1:2008mc10024
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Maureen Lane
Becker v. Warden Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jan Becker
Defendant:
Warden Hudson, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Title 11 Holdings, LLC v. Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund, et al.
as 1:2007mc00056
Defendant:
Fidelity Capital Apprecation Fund, Robert G. Babson, James P. Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Title 11 Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
McGrath v. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
as 4:2007cv40111
Plaintiff:
Maureen McGrath
Defendant:
UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Duhaime, et al v. John Hancock Mutual, et al
as 1:1996cv10706
Plaintiff:
Richard Duhaime , Maureen Hahn , Theodore A. Peck and others
Defendant:
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company , John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Distributors, Inc.
Movant:
Howard M. Metzenbaum , John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) and Signator Investors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
