Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 98
BARTA v. ANALOGIC CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv10965
Plaintiff: STEVE BARTA
Defendant: ANALOGIC CORPORATION, FRED B. PARKS, BERNARD C. BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Okereke v. Judges of the Suffolk Superior Court (Massachusetts)
as 1:2018mc91191
Petitioner: Precious Okereke
Defendant: Judges of the Suffolk Superior Court (Massachusetts)
Harden Manufacturing Corporation v. Pfizer, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv10981
Consolidated Plaintiff: Linda B. Shearer, Donna Sims, Joshua M. Martinez and others
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc., Melissa Hamill, Parke-Davis and others
Not Classified By Court: Judge Judith G. Dein, Carol Janney and Darren Mancuso
Consolidated Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Dainippon Pharmaceuticals USA Corporation, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Members of the Class Plaintiffs Steering Committee, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Benjamin Jonathan Crone and others
Intervenor: Rhonda Gayle Goodridge, Mark Dudley, Susan Dudley and others
In Re: Neurontin Marketing Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Interested Party: Travelers Indemnity Company
Intervenor Plaintiff: American Home Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 17-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: BOSTON, MA, Through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Defendant: STEVEN AMARAL and KATIE AMARAL
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In Re: Mandry-Mercado
as 16-2518
Petitioner: JAVIER E. MANDRY-MERCADO
Respondent: VANESSA LUGO-OBJIO, CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONDOMINIO EL SENORIAL, MANUEL ZENGOTITA, Former President of HOA and others
Laucks v. McVay, et al
as 16-2420
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELINDA LAUCKS
Defendant - Appellee: MARK MCVAY, JOHN D. DEACON, JR., WILLIAM MARK RUSSO, as individual and in his official capacity as Court appointed "Special Master" and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In re: Dickey
as 16-1799
Petitioner: JAMES DICKEY
Respondent: BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Gonzalez Lopez, et al v. Otero, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant: VICENTE GONZALEZ LOPEZ, LINNETTE MUNOZ-SANTIAGO, VICTOR FRANCO and others
Defendant - Appellee: OCTAVIO OTERO, an investigator with the Department of the Army Civilian Police, in his personal and official capacities, EDWIN SEPULVEDA, an investigator with the Department of the Army Civilian Police, in his personal and official capacities, STEPHEN ACKMAN, Garrison Commander, Ft. Buchanan, in his personal and official capacities and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?