Cases 51 - 58 of 58
TANG v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
as 1:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
BRYANT TANG
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhode Island Fishermen's Allia, et al v. Rhode Island Department of Env, et al
as 08-2390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHODE ISLAND FISHERMEN'S ALLIANCE, by and through its President, Richard Fuka, STEVEN RILEY, Individually, BRIAN LOFTES, Individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
W. MICHAEL SULLIVAN, in his capacity as the Directror of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, AL CHRISTOPHER, LANNY DELLINGER and others
MORRIS v. REGIS CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
RYISHISA MORRIS
Defendant:
REGIS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TD BANKNORTH INSURANCE AGENCY INC et al v. CIOPPA
as 2:2007cv00170
Plaintiff:
TD BANKNORTH INSURANCE AGENCY INC , TD BANK NA , MORRIS INSURANCE SERVICES INC and others
Defendant:
MILA KOFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rhode Island Fishermen's Alliance et al v. The Department of Environmental Management et al
as 1:2007cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rhode Island Fishermen's Alliance, Steven Riley, Brian Loftes and others
Defendant:
The Department of Environmental Management and W. Michael Sullivan, PH.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
EchoStar Satellite, L.L.C. v. Barenboym
as 1:2007cv10420
Plaintiff:
EchoStar Satellite, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Edward Barenboym
ADR Provider:
Morris E. Lasker
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United Senior Assoc. v. Philip Morris Inc., et al
as 06-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED SENIOR ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILIP MORRIS INC., R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACC, BROWN & WILLIAMSON and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
