Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 418
US v. Nieves-Perez
as 20-1967
Defendant / Appellant: CARLOS JAVIER NIEVES-PEREZ, a/k/a Seven
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: EMMA M. GREENWOOD, Court Appointed Coordinating Discovery Attorney
Lopez-Ramirez, et al v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1937
Defendant: GRUPO HIMA SAN PABLO, INC., d/b/a Hospital Hima-San Pablo de Caguas, JASON DAVIS, NEXT STEP MEDICAL CO. INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EULALIA LOPEZ-RAMIREZ and LAURA CRISTINA GAUDIER-LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee: MARIA M. TOLEDO-GONZALEZ and CENTRO MEDICO DEL TURABO INC., d/b/a Hospital Hima-San Pablo de Caguas
Ponsa-Rabell, et al v. Santander Securities, LLC, et al
as 20-1857
Defendant / Appellee: SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC., BANCO SANTANDER, S.A., SANTANDER BANCORP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARILU CADILLA-REBOLLEDO, by herself and on behalf of her children's accounts, CARINA PEREZ-CISNEROS ARMENTEROS and JORGE PONSA-RABELL
Plaintiff: YGRC MINOR CHILD, CIRC MINOR CHILD, CIRC MINOR and others
US v. Ortiz-Perez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1838
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: JEAN PAUL ORTIZ-PEREZ
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 20-1851
Respondent: ROBERTO FELIBERTI-CINTRON, Judge of the Supreme Court, ANDRES SALAS-SOLER, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. CARLOS CANDELARIA-ROSA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico and others
Petitioner: HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
Perez v. US
as 20-1796
Petitioner / Appellant: ABEL PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Alvarez-Cabrera, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., et al
as 20-1798
Plaintiff / Appellant: TATIANA ALVAREZ-PEREZ, SANDRA PEREZ-MENDEZ and LUIS ALVAREZ-CABRERA
Defendant / Appellee: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. and TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Bollat Vasquez, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1554
Plaintiff / Appellee: J.C., LUISA M. VASQUEZ PEREZ DE BOLLAT, ANDRES OSWALDO BOLLAT VASQUEZ, individually and as next friend to Luisa Marisol Vasquez Perez de Bollat, and as father and next friend to A.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Amicus Curiae: DAVID ROBINSON, JUSTICE CENTER OF SOUTHEAST MASSACHUSETTS, KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?