Cases 81 - 90 of 261
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Acosta
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Anastacio v. 13th Avenue Florist LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00667
Defendant:
George Proco, Constantino Proco and 13th Avenue Florist LLC
Plaintiff:
Saul Anastacio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thurman v. City of Pleasanton Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv01265
Defendant:
City of Pleasanton Police Department and Anastacio Perez
Plaintiff:
John Morgan Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MENDOZA v. USA
as 5:2017cv00285
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANASTACIO MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ovalle, Sr v. USA Trucking
as 3:2017cv03047
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Chavez Ovalle, Sr
Defendant:
USA Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Momo Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Banco Popular North America, et al
as 17-3223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOMO ENTERPRISES, LLC, a dissolved limited liability company, ANASTACIO GONZALEZ and PLAZA LOUNGE, LLC, a dissolved limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, now known as POPULAR COMMUNITY BANK, PEAK PROPERTIES, DAVID AXELROD and others
Niavez v. Wack et al
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Niavez
Respondent:
FNU Wack, FNU Hamell, FNU Leopol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niavez v. Wack et al
as 1:2017cv00865
Defendant:
Officer FNU Gutierez, Officer FNU Hamell, Sgt. FNU Leopol and others
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Niavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
