Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity, GE BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv11746
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Echavarria v. Hollow
as 21-1894
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANGEL ECHAVARRIA
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ROACH, JOHN GARVIN, RAYMOND GUILLERMO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN HOLLOW
Interested Party:
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY, FLORENE GRAVES and ESSEX DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Traverse, et al v. The Gutierrez Company, et al
as 21-1754
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORMAN TRAVERSE and NASSRINE TRAVERSE
Defendant / Appellant:
GUTIERREZ COMPANY, GUTIERREZ CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ARTURO J. GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
TECHNOLOGY PARK X LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Traverse, et al v. The Gutierrez Company, et al
as 21-1703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN TRAVERSE and NASSRINE TRAVERSE
Defendant / Appellee:
GUTIERREZ COMPANY, GUTIERREZ CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ARTURO J. GUTIERREZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
