Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Wells v. Pierce et al
as 1:2024fp00100
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Wells
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., BOFA Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Pierce et al v. Premier Health Partners
as 1:2024cv10618
Plaintiff:
Gloria Pierce, Christine Hughes and Michael Finley
Defendant:
Premier Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Guo v. John Pierce School et al
as 1:2023cv12583
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Hongnian Guo
Defendant:
John Pierce School and Jamie Yadoff
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Guo v. John Pierce School et al
as 1:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Hongnian Guo
Defendant:
John Pierce School and Jamie Yadoff
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 22-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, Secretary, DAVID PIERCE, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF), DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF) and others
Defendant:
ARTHUR SAWYER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association (MLA), CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, JOHN HAVILAND and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL J. MOORE, M.D., PETER CORKERON and UNITED STATES
Rowan v. Pierce
as 3:2020cv01648
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rowan
Defendant:
Brock Pierce
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Strahan v. Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs et al
as 1:2019cv10639
Plaintiff:
Richard Max Strahan, Max, Pro Se Party Richard Max Strahan and others
Defendant:
Secretary, Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs ("MEOEEA"), Arthur Sawyer, Center for Coastal Studies and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Survival Fund
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael J. Moore
Interested Party:
Peter Corkeron and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Blotzer v. Pierce et al
as 3:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
John Blotzer
Defendant:
Brock Pierce and Stratics Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Blotzer v. Pierce et al
as 3:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
John Blotzer
Defendant:
Brock Pierce and Stratics Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: Koplow
as 21-1638
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Respondent:
DANA WILLIAM, GERALD FABIANO, LAW FIRM OF PIERCE, DAVIS, PERRITANO and others
Appellee:
LEO ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
