Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Ardon Salvajan v. USCIS et al
as 1:2024cv11268
Plaintiff:
Wilfrido N Ardon Salvajan
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), Asylum Office, USCIS, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Other:
United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alvarez Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1260
Petitioner:
JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alvarez Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1112
Petitioner:
JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mendoza-Bonilla v. Garland
as 23-2060
Petitioner:
CINTHIA ELENA MENDOZA-BONILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Mendoza-Mendez
as 23-1926
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL MANUELLE MENDOZA-MENDEZ, a/k/a Mendo
Melo v. Riordan et al
as 1:2023cv10832
Plaintiff:
Nuno Jorge Correia de Melo
Defendant:
Denis Riordan, EmilyRose F. Costa, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivera Novack v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv10635
Plaintiff:
Ana Cecilia Rivera Novack
Defendant:
Loren K. Miller, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Acting Secretary of Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
XU et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
WENHUA XU and JIAQI XU
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In Re: Kyricopoulos
as 22-1470
Petitioner:
JAMES PETER KYRICOPOULOS
Respondent:
MAURA TRACY HEALEY, Attorney General and MARTA MENDOZA, Probation Officer
ODU v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv10252
Plaintiff:
TUNDE ODU
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Michael McCleary
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
