Cases 1 - 10 of 62
US v. Berrios-Cruz
as 23-1708
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM BERRIOS-CRUZ
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
US v. Recarey-Salas, et al
as 23-1304
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO RECAREY-SALAS
Interested Party:
ESTATE OF ALBERTO AVILES, SCOTIABANK DE PUERTO RICO, ALFONSA RODRIGUEZ-CHAPARRO and others
US v. Vazquez-Berrios
as 23-1311
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL VAZQUEZ-BERRIOS
People of Puerto Rico et al v. Berrios-Merced
as 3:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
People of Puerto Rico and Luis Alberto Martinez-Pino
Petitioner:
Joalmi Berrios-Merced and Dr. Joalmi Berrios-Merced
Intervenor:
Sociedad Para Asistencia Legal de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
US v. Rivera-Berrios
as 22-1681
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIAN G. RIVERA-BERRIOS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Serrano-Berrios
as 21-1457
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIX A. SERRANO-BERRIOS
Gonzalez Berrios v. Triple S Propiedad, Inc.
as 21-1242
Defendant:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., EMERGENCY SERVICES GROUP, INC., HANNEY CORDERO-GONZALEZ, his Spouse and the conjugal legal partnership Cordero-Gonzalez and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
TRIPLE-S PROPIEDAD, INC. and SIMED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE RIVERA RIVERA, his Spouse and the conjugal legal partnership Rivera-Rivera, MEDICAL DEFENSE INSURANCE CO., A,B,C,D,E,F,G, AND H INSURANCE COMPANIES and others
Interested Party:
WANDA I. GONZALEZ-BERRIOS and NOREEN WISCOVITCH RENTAS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELICA M. GONZALEZ BERRIOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
