Cases 1 - 10 of 11
US v. Carpenter
as 24-1389
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party:
BRIAN FITZGERALD, Estate of Byron Darling and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
US v. Carpenter
as 21-1935
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party:
BRIAN FITZERALD, Estate of Byron Darling
Jacobowitz, et al v. Darling Realty, Inc., et al
as 21-1040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRWIN JACOBOWITZ, PEARL H. JACOBOWITZ, MONTANA JACOBOWITZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLING REALTY, INC., AT HOME STORE, DAVID DARLING, in his official capacity and as an individual and others
Abernathy v. Anderson
as 19-1880
Defendant:
THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI, BRUCE GELB, MICHAEL RUMERY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRYSTAL ANDERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN B. ABERNATHY
US v. Carpenter
as 15-2374
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party:
BRIAN FITZGERALD and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
US v. Carpenter
as 14-1641
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party:
BRIAN FITZGERALD and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
US v. Carpenter
as 14-1286
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party:
BRIAN FITZGERALD and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
Darling v. Receivables Performance Management
as 1:2011cv11565
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management
Plaintiff:
Nathan Darling
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
MAINE STATE OF et al v. ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC et al
as 1:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
MAINE, STATE OF and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF
Defendant:
ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC, AMOCO UNION, BANGOR TIRE CO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC et al
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC, AMOCO UNION, BANGOR TIRE CO and others
Consol_plaintiff:
MAINE, STATE OF and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
