Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Hassell v. Kimbark, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW-LANE HASSELL
Defendant:
DEVIN AILEEN KIMBARK, CHERYL L. KIMBARK, MARK KIMBARK and others
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. Shetrawski et al
as 1:2024cv10363
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Shetrawski, Captain Flynn, Brook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Fishman
as 24-1047
Petitioner:
DEBORAH FISHMAN
Respondent:
MASSACHUSETTS PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT, HONORABLE JUDGE CHRISTINE ANTHONY, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES and others
Jeannite v. Sorokin et al
as 1:2023cv12854
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
J. Sorokin doing business as judge at supreme court and Young doing business as judge at supreme court
Withers v. Denise et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Denise, Judge Darigan, Judge Hrorshburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jeannite v. Saris
as 1:2023cv11885
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Judge Patti Saris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Judge Denise Casper et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Judge Denise Casper and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson et al v. Todisco Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11567
Plaintiff:
Natalie Anderson and Andre Bisasor
Defendant:
Todisco Services Inc., Pasquale III Todisco, Matthew Mazzarella and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Kenneth P. Neiman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cantave v. Gomes et al
as 1:2023cv10883
Plaintiff:
Nakia Cantave
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Sylvia Gomes, Jessire Pena, Patrisha Toxey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
