Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bock v. Sloane, et al
as 23-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL BOCK, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE ABRAHAM, solely in his individual capacity and CANDACE LAPIDUS SLOANE, solely in her individual capacity
Bock v. Sloane et al
as 1:2022cv10905
Plaintiff:
Randall Bock and Pro se Litigant Randall Bock
Defendant:
Candace Lapidus Sloane and George Abraham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. Hulka et al
as 1:2017cv11939
Plaintiff:
Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, MD PhD
Defendant:
Carol Hulka, M.D., Rachel Nardin, M.D., James Paikos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Errant Gene Therapeutics, LLC v. Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research et al
as 1:2016mc91320
Plaintiff:
Errant Gene Therapeutics, LLC
Defendant:
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
Movant:
Nick Leschly
In Re: Padmanabhan
as 15-1638
Petitioner:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANBHAN
Respondent:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD, WILLIAM KASSLER and others
Abdelgadir et al v. Telexelectric, L.L.L.P. et al
as 4:2015cv40028
Plaintiff:
Esam Abdelgadir , Rita Dos Santos and Joseph Shikhman
Defendant:
TelexElectric, LLLP, Telez Mobile, Holdings, Inc., Telex Mobile Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv40156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Magalhaes v. Wanzeler et al
as 1:2014cv12437
Defendant:
Carlos N. Wanzeler , James Matthew Merrill, Carlos Roberto Costa and others
Plaintiff:
Olavo Ferreira Magalhaes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, Ltd. v. Gibson
as 1:2014cv00254
Plaintiff:
Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, Ltd.
Defendant:
Sloan D. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Griffith v. Merrill et al
as 1:2014cv12058
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Griffith
Defendant:
James M. Merrill, Carlos N. Wanzeler, Steven M. Labriola and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
