Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In Re: Hall
as 22-1987
Petitioner:
DANIEL E. HALL, a/k/a Sensa Verogna
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and TWITTER, INC.
Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
as 21-1317
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSA VEROGNA, individual
DeLima v. Google LLC, et al
as 21-1161
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC and TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATASHA DELIMA
Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
as 20-2091
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSA VEROGNA, individual
Verogna v. Twitter Inc.
as 20-2005
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSA VEROGNA, individual
Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
as 20-2006
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSA VEROGNA, individual
Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
as 20-1933
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER INC. and TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSA VEROGNA, individual
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11283
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Amicus Curiae:
LinkedIn Corp., Dropbox, Inc., The Catholic University of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Delima v. YouTube Inc., et al
as 18-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATASHA DELIMA
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC. and others
Delima v. YouTube, Inc., et al
as 18-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATASHA DELIMA
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
