Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Flores, et al v. OneWest Bank, F.S.B., et al
as 16-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO A. FLORES, ESTHER YANES-ALVARES and ROSA YANES
Defendant - Appellee:
ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B., INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Johnson et al v. OneWest Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
George K. Johnson and April M. Johnson
Defendant:
OneWest Bank, F.S.B. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fernandez, et al v. Mortgage Electronic, et al
as 14-1479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO FERNANDEZ and ELETICIA GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B. and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Smith, III, et al v. Mortgage Electronic, et al
as 14-1480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES M. SMITH, III and MARIA CASIMIRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B. and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Eggert v. Mortgage Electronic, et al
as 14-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL F. EGGERT
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B. and FANNIE MAE NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Larivaux, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 14-1017
Plaintiff:
FROIDO FAYETTE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAPHNE LARIVAUX, f/k/a Daphne Laurivaux-Fayette
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B.
Defendant:
MORTGAGEIT, INC. and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Mills v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2012cv10937
Plaintiff:
Rhonda G. Mills
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Onewest Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2012cv10938
Plaintiff:
Rhonda G. Mills
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Onewest Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
