Cases 31 - 40 of 214
Karl et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2021cv10918
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robert Karl and Charlotte Karl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reid, Jr. v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
as 1:2021cv10914
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Reid, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv10410
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bey and Anthony Guess
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ravida v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 1:2021cv10350
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ravida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koenig et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Danielle Koenig and Anthony Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massa v. Chester et al
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Roberta Chester and Anthony Chester
Plaintiff:
Marina E. Massa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01169
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giorgianni v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00494
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Giorgianni
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodrigues et al v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2020cv11455
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rodrigues and Maria Rodrigues
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caruana et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00882
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Janice Caruana and Anthony Caruana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
