Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McIntyre, et al v. US, et al
as 11-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMILY MCINTYRE, as Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre and CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, in his capacity as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
KAREN FLEMMI SNOW, JEANETTE FLEMMI BENEDETTI, JAMES FLYNN and others
Trustee:
FLEET NATIONAL BANK and DEDHAM INSTITUTIION FOR SAVINGS
McIntyre, et al v. US, et al
as 11-1018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EMILY MCINTYRE, as Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre and CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, in his capacity as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
ELAINE BARRETT, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur M. Barrett, KAREN FLEMMI SNOW, JEANETTE FLEMMI BENEDETTI and others
Trustee:
DEDHAM INSTITUTIION FOR SAVINGS and FLEET NATIONAL BANK
The Estate of Edward Brian Hal v. US, et al
as 09-1951
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD BRIAN HALLORAN, by Patricia Marie Maccarelli, in her capacity as Administratrix of The Estate of Edward Brian Halloran
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, acting through the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
The Estate of Edward Brian Hal v. US, et al
as 09-1952
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD BRIAN HALLORAN, by Patricia Marie Maccarelli, in her capacity as Administratrix of The Estate of Edward Brian Halloran
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, acting through the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Limone, et al v. US, et al
as 08-1328
Plaintiff:
PETER J. LIMONE, OLYMPIA LIMONE, PETER J. LIMONE and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
EDWARD GRECO
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DENNIS CONDON, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
, , and others
Limone, et al v. US, et al
as 08-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER J. LIMONE, OLYMPIA LIMONE, PETER J. LIMONE and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
EDWARD GRECO
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DENNIS CONDON, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
, , and others
McIntyre, et al v. US, et al
as 07-1663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EMILY MCINTYRE, as Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre and CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, in his capacity as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Trustee:
FLEET NATIONAL BANK and DEDHAM INSTITUTIION, FOR SAVINGS
:
, , and others
Wheeler, et al v. US, et al
as 03-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE A. WHEELER, PATRICIA J. LANGHOLZ, PAMELA NORBERG and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JOHN J. CONNOLLY, H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS and others
Limone, et al v. United States of, et al
as 1:2002cv10890
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Limone , Olympia Limone , Peter J. Limone, Jr. and others
Defendant:
United States of America , Dennis Condon , John Morris and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Edward Greco
Consolidated_defendant:
United States of America at U.S. Postal Service, Unknown Agents of the United States of America and Unknown State Law Enforcement Officers
Intervenor:
Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives and Globe Newspaper Co., Inc.
Movant:
WolfBlock LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
