Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pinto et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PINTO, III and JULIE PINTO
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hoover v. Hyatt Corporation, et al
as 22-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDAN HOOVER
Defendant / Appellee:
HYATT CORPORATION and OTIS ELEVATOR
AbuAlrub et al v. Puerto Rico Port Authority et al
as 3:2021cv01203
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Port Authority, Otis Elevator Company, Luis Munoz Marin International Airport and others
Plaintiff:
Ola Talal AbuAlrub and Amer Rashed Ahmad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Velez et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv12517
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Otis Elevator Service Company
Plaintiff:
Martin Velez and Kim Velez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delprete v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv00565
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Joanne Delprete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aftandilian v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv10590
Plaintiff:
Stella Aftandilian
Defendant:
United States of America, Emcor Government Services, Inc., Otis Elevator Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Otis v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2016cv12133
Plaintiff:
Amy Otis
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Callahan v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12039
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Callahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mukarker v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 1:2016cv10355
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mukarker
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia , Philadelphia International Airport and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson, Jr. v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv13525
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
