Cases 111 - 120 of 168
Williams v. Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences et al
as 1:2012cv10313
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Williams
Defendant:
Scott L Massey, Thomas Moreau, Susan White and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
GUZMAN v. DEJESUS et al
as 3:2011cv30278
Plaintiff:
VIRGEN GUZMAN
Defendant:
CLARA M. DEJESUS, ISAIAS CRUZ , JOEY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bettencourt, Jr. v. Town of Dartmouth et al
as 1:2011cv12135
Plaintiff:
John E. Bettencourt, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Dartmouth, Randall M. Medeiros, Sean M. McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McArdle v. Town of Dracut et al
as 1:2011cv11805
Plaintiff:
Raymond C McArdle
Defendant:
Town of Dracut, Theresa Rogers, Dracut Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dean v. Lunenburg, Town of et al
as 4:2011cv40182
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean
Defendant:
Lunenburg, Town of, County of Osceola, Florida, Daniel F. Bourgeois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hotyckey v. Framingham Police Dept. et al
as 1:2011cv11308
Plaintiff:
Scott Hotyckey
Defendant:
Framingham Police Dept. , Steven Carl and Officer Cezer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gagne et al v. Borden et al
as 1:2011cv11262
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Gagne and Scott Pare
Defendant:
Richard Borden and The City of Haverhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt et al v. Massachusetts et al
as 1:2011cv11142
Plaintiff:
Amanda Pratt
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Kingston, Town of , Plymouth, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport et al
as 1:2011cv11073
Plaintiff:
James Atkinson
Defendant:
Town of Rockport, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Salem State College and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
