Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Morales v City of Worcester, et al.
as 4:2014cv40017
Plaintiff:
Daisy L. Morales
Defendant:
James Powers and City of Worcester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eze v. Jim Appleyard et al
as 1:2013cv12542
Plaintiff:
John Eze
Defendant:
Jim Appleyard, James Conroy, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon-Powers v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2012cv12384
Plaintiff:
Jeanne McMahon-Powers
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Bristol County and Plymouth County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brockton Power et al v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2012cv11047
Plaintiff:
Brockton Power and Brockton Power Company LLC
Defendant:
City of Brockton , Planning Board of the City of Brockton , Brockton City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardoso v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2012cv10892
Plaintiff:
Aristides Cardoso
Defendant:
City of Brockton, Linda M. Balzotti, William K Conlon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv30090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brodin v. Rojas et al
as 4:2011cv40179
Plaintiff:
Kristin Brodin
Defendant:
David Rojas, Ramon Roman, James Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tvedten v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2010cv11291
Plaintiff:
Tyler Tvedten
Defendant:
City of Boston, George Crowley, Andrew Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv30101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
