Cases 11 - 16 of 16
PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR TEH ELDERLY et al v. Garcia-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2009cv02018
Plaintiff:
PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR TEH ELDERLY, Rossana Lopez-Leon and Hon. Luis Fortuo -Burset
Defendant:
Hon.Carlos Garcia-Rodriguez, Hon. Juan Carlos Puig Morales, Hon. Jose Perez Riera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jorge Aponte-Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 08-1482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE E. APONTE-HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ANA P. CRUZ-VELEZ, Contractor-Prosecutor Of The Government Of Territory Of Puerto Rico and HECTOR M. MONTANEZ-REYES, Contractor-Prosecutor Of The Government Of Puerto Rico
Defendant:
ANIBAL ACEVEDO-VILA, Governor Of Puerto Rico and JOSE PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, Contractor-Prosecutor Of The Government Of Puerto Rico
:
Aponte-Hernandez v. Acevedo-Vila, et al
as 08-1161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JORGE E. APONTE-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
ANIBAL ACEVEDO-VILA, Governor Of Puerto Rico
Defendant - Appellant:
ANA P. CRUZ-VELEZ, Contractor-Prosecutor Of The Government Of Territory Of Puerto Rico, HECTOR M. MONTANEZ-REYES, Contractor-Prosecutor Of The Government Of Puerto Rico, JOSE PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, Contractor-Prosecutor Of The Government Of Puerto Rico and others
Garcia-Rubiera, et al v. Calderon, et al
as 07-2409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLADYS GARCIA-RUBIERA, DOMINGO A. CORPORAN-SUAREZ, ADALBERTO RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SILA MARIA CALDERON, Governor of Puerto Rico, sued only in her official capacity as Governor and JUAN ANTONIO FLORES-GALARZA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
