Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Cullinane v. Town of Concord
as 1:2023cv11526
Plaintiff:
Scott Cullinane
Defendant:
Town of Concord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pelkey v. Haines
as 1:2023cv11201
Plaintiff:
Scott Edward Pelkey
Defendant:
Avril Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mukulukusso v. Doogan et al
as 4:2023cv11096
Plaintiff:
Fernando Mukulukusso
Defendant:
William E. Doogan, Karim Elhamaway, Evan Maclean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Choy v. Brockton et al
as 1:2023cv10340
Plaintiff:
Frances Y Choy
Defendant:
City of Brockton, Eric Clark, Richard Scott Warmington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galego v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2022cv12243
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Galego
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Albert F Dupere, Athanasios Parousis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitta v. Medeiros et al
as 1:2022cv11641
Plaintiff:
Scott D Pitta
Defendant:
Dina Medeiros and Bridgewater Raynham Regional School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
retzlaff v. Northampton, City of et al
as 3:2022cv30119
Plaintiff:
Jenison Retzlaff
Defendant:
Northampton, City of, Scott T. Gregory, Nicholas J. Limoges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gould v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2022cv30116
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Land Court Department, Judge Gordon H. Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Viera v. McDonough
as 1:2022cv10775
Plaintiff:
Scott Anthony Viera, Jr
Defendant:
Denis Richard McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
