Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Vanderburgh House LLC et al v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40063
Plaintiff:
Vanderburgh House LLC and Southbridge RE LLC
Defendant:
City of Worcester , John R. Kelly , David C Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jellyman v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40030
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Jellyman
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Michael Spalatro, Jarret J. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dann v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40026
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dann
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Worcester Police Department , Trevis Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henton v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40018
Plaintiff:
Harry Henton
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination , James Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40003
Plaintiff:
Melissa Montanez
Defendant:
City of Worcester and William A. Hinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Halabi v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40127
Plaintiff:
Hatem Halabi
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Officer, John Doe #1 and Officer, John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40103
Plaintiff:
Carl S. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Carl Supernor, Terrence Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Santa Maria v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40063
Plaintiff:
David A Santa Maria
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Dana Randall , Michael Hanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deptula v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40055
Plaintiff:
Luke Deptula
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Jeffrey Carlson , James E Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40029
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Rivera
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Terrence Cahill , Carl Supernor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
