Cases 21 - 30 of 45
DAGGETT v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv00303
Defendant:
TOWN OF BERWICK, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAGGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN et al v. HAMILTON
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN OLSEN , NANCY SHAW , JANE DOE and others
Defendant:
RICKLER HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ALGIERI v. JAMES et al
as 2:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
DAWN ALGIERI
Defendant:
RANDALL JAMES, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON et al v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al
as 2:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
SUSAN JOHNSON and DERRICK THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF BIDDEFORD, BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMITER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
JASON PALMITER
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, KEVIN JOYCE, JOHN DOE ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDSON v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
ARLENE EDSON
Defendant:
PAUL L LEPAGE , RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER , MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRISH et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY IRISH and KIMBERLY IRISH
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, STATE POLICE OF THE STATE OF MAINE and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES STATE POLICE OFFICERS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWETT v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
PAMELA SWETT
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, BARRY DELONG, JEFFREY JACQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCUE v. CITY OF BANGOR MAINE et al
as 1:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCUE
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR MAINE , BANGOR MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT , KIM DONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
