Civil Rights Cases filed in Maine
Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00508
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ARMSTRONG v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff: SEDGEWICK ARMSTRONG
Defendant: RANDALL LIBERTY , MARSHA ALEXANDER , COREY GOODCHILD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONLOGUE v. HAMILTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00296
Plaintiff: DANARAE L CONLOGUE
Defendant: SCOTT HAMILTON , TAYLOR C DUBE , TED MILLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDSON v. LEPAGE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff: ARLENE EDSON
Defendant: PAUL L LEPAGE , RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER , MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOORE v. TOWN OF WELLS et al
as 2:2015cv00356
Plaintiff: DANIEL M MOORE
Defendant: TOWN OF WELLS and JONATHAN L CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00196
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00515
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00360
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00342
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?