Cases 41 - 50 of 327
Perez-Soto v. Ramirez-Nazario et al ***DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE. LEAD CASE IS NOW CIVIL CASE NO. 19-1266.***
as 3:2019cv01774
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Giselle Romero-Garcia, Hon. Judge Fernando Torres-Ramirez, Hon. Judge Carlos Vizcarrondo-Irizarri and others
Plaintiff:
Hiram Perez-Soto
Consolidated Defendant:
Maite D. Oronoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
GUZMAN PEREZ et al
as 3:2019cv01765
Plaintiff:
Maria Hernandez-Santiago and Jennie Guzman-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman-Perez et al v. Ojeda-Batista et al
as 3:2019cv01766
Defendant:
Professional Equipment, Manuel Ojeda-Batista and MOB Investment Corp.
Plaintiff:
Maria Hernandez-Santiago and Jennie Guzman-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Velez-Acevedo et al v. Centro de Cancer de La Universidad de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2019cv01560
Plaintiff:
Hector Aponte-Benejan, Conjugal Partnership Aponte-Velez and Grendaliz Velez-Acevedo
Defendant:
Mary Pou de Clavell, Centro de Cancer de La Universidad de Puerto Rico, Luis A. Clavell-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Soto v. Oronoz et al
as 3:2019cv01266
Plaintiff:
hiram i. perez soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
